top of page
![[연구논문] THE RED FLAG OF EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) Institutional Conflict Resulting in Different COVID-19 Testing Outcomes Comparing the United States and South Korea](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/45975b_d3b91274673440b1a3443c4ffc599401~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/45975b_d3b91274673440b1a3443c4ffc599401~mv2.webp)
![[연구논문] THE RED FLAG OF EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) Institutional Conflict Resulting in Different COVID-19 Testing Outcomes Comparing the United States and South Korea](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/45975b_d3b91274673440b1a3443c4ffc599401~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_454,h_341,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/45975b_d3b91274673440b1a3443c4ffc599401~mv2.webp)
[연구논문] THE RED FLAG OF EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) Institutional Conflict Resulting in Different COVID-19 Testing Outcomes Comparing the United States and South Korea
The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) policy, a representative biodefense policy, was legislated in the United States in 2001 based on lessons learned from Amerithrax, whereas Korea’s EUA policy was based on lessons learned from the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak in 2015. Due to these divergent origins, the U.S. EUA’s homeland security objectives were specialized to deal with highly pathogenic biological agents that could be exploited for bioterrorism, whereas the
2025년 5월 22일
![[연구논문] Revisiting Health Security Governance: The Korean Biosurveillance Regime from Biopolitics to Biocitizenship](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/45975b_5fe08af0baf34d13a69beac324397bde~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_140,h_181,fp_0.50_0.50,lg_1,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/45975b_5fe08af0baf34d13a69beac324397bde~mv2.webp)
![[연구논문] Revisiting Health Security Governance: The Korean Biosurveillance Regime from Biopolitics to Biocitizenship](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/45975b_5fe08af0baf34d13a69beac324397bde~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_100,h_129,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/45975b_5fe08af0baf34d13a69beac324397bde~mv2.webp)
[연구논문] Revisiting Health Security Governance: The Korean Biosurveillance Regime from Biopolitics to Biocitizenship
제목: Revisiting Health Security Governance: The Korean Biosurveillance Regime from Biopolitics to Biocitizenship 요약: The South Korean COVID-19 pandemic response implemented a new biosurveillance regime actively utilizing new information and communication technology (ICT) and digital tools, centered on the testing, tracing, and treating (3T) strategy. Critics argue that Korea’s 3T strategy may violate individuals’ privacy and human rights. According to Foucauldian perspectives,
2025년 5월 21일
bottom of page